statementSaid on 2026-11-10
Such decisions do not constitute consideration of items not included in the agenda if they do not create independent legal consequences different from those of dismissal and appointment.
A statement by supremecourtua, said on 2026-11-10. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Це не є розглядом питань, не включених до порядку денного, якщо такі рішення не породжують самостійних правових наслідків, відмінних від наслідків звільнення та призначення.
Related claims
Temporary suspension of the previous director from exercising powers while retaining salary for the transition period is in such a case a regulation of the consequences of dismissal, not a separate agenda item.supremecourtua · statementDetermining the date of a director's dismissal and the director's status until that date are components of resolving the dismissal issue, not separate agenda items of a general meeting of a company.КГС ВС · statementThe rulings contain conclusions that the grounds for excluding a participant from an LLC are exhaustive and that exclusion is impossible for failure to comply with a general meeting decision.Огляд актуальної судової практики Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду · statementThe Constitutional Court held that questions of how exactly the cancellation of the decision affected remuneration and whether the courts correctly considered the case fall within the competence of courts of general jurisdiction.КС · statementThe rulings contain conclusions on the invalidity of a transaction aimed at alienating a share in a company's charter capital contrary to an asset-freezing sanction, and on applying the consequences of such a transaction.Огляд актуальної судової практики Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду · statementThe Constitutional Court held that cancellation of a decision of a body of a joint-stock company does not by itself terminate or change workers' labor rights that have already arisen.Конституционном суде · statement
More claims by supremecourtua
The Supreme Court, composed of the joint chamber of the Civil Cassation Court, reached these conclusions while ensuring the unity of judicial practice.statementFailure by a participant to comply with a general meeting decision, in particular failure to provide documents to update information on ultimate beneficial owners, is not grounds for forced exclusion of such a participant.statementThe Law of Ukraine "On Limited and Additional Liability Companies" establishes an exhaustive list of grounds for excluding a participant from a company: non-contribution of a share and death of a participant if their heirs have not applied to the LLC with an application to join.statementA child's temporary stay outside Ukraine must not restrict the child's right to maintain regular relations with both parents.statementEnsuring the child's best interests, preserving the child's family ties and establishing a real and effective communication arrangement is decisive.statement
All claims by supremecourtua