---
title: "Верховний Суд дійшов висновку про допуск представництва без статусу адвоката під час судового контролю за виконанням судових рішень — DecisionGateway"
description: "The Supreme Court's joint panel of the Civil Cassation Court held that where non-attorney representation is allowed in labor and minor disputes, it also applies"
canonical_url: "https://dgw.tmarket.io/decisions/01a1d4e1-199d-7ac1-b40d-0f400b9fd004"
meta:
  "og:description": "The Supreme Court's joint panel of the Civil Cassation Court held that where non-attorney representation is allowed in labor and minor disputes, it also applies"
  "og:image": "https://dgw.tmarket.io/og.jpg"
  "og:image:alt": "White network of connected nodes crossed by a timeline on black"
  "og:image:height": "1024"
  "og:image:width": "1024"
  "og:title": "Верховний Суд дійшов висновку про допуск представництва без статусу адвоката під час судового контролю за виконанням судових рішень — DecisionGateway"
  "twitter:image": "https://dgw.tmarket.io/og.jpg"
---

> Index of every page on this site: [llms.txt](https://dgw.tmarket.io/llms.txt)

**Decision**/Other

**Adopted**

# **Верховний Суд дійшов висновку про допуск представництва без статусу адвоката під час судового контролю за виконанням судових рішень**

The Supreme Court's joint panel of the Civil Cassation Court held that where non-attorney representation is allowed in labor and minor disputes, it also applies during court control over enforcement of judgments, ensuring uniform practice.

## **Actors and targets**

Targets ст. 61 ЦПК Україниpolicy

## **Source**

> Таких висновків дійшов Верховний Суд у складі об’єднаної палати Касаційного цивільного суду, забезпечуючи єдність судової практики.

*supremecourtua · Telegram [ Open post](https://t.me/supremecourtua/4422)*

## **Extracted detail**

Fields read from the post for this record type. The first group is ordered by what a reader usually needs; the rest stays collapsed.

<dl>

<dt>Court</dt>
<dd>Верховний Суд</dd>

<dt>Country</dt>
<dd>Ukraine</dd>

</dl>

## **Related decisions**

Same kind only, ranked by embedding similarity to this record.

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#website","@type":"WebSite","description":"Decisions, events and falsifiable forecasts from 3,000+ Telegram channels — every claim cited. Read free.","name":"DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/","publisher":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#identity"}},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/decisions/01a1d4e1-199d-7ac1-b40d-0f400b9fd004#webpage","@type":"WebPage","description":"The Supreme Court's joint panel of the Civil Cassation Court held that where non-attorney representation is allowed in labor and minor disputes, it also applies","name":"Верховний Суд дійшов висновку про допуск представництва без статусу адвоката під час судового контролю за виконанням судових рішень — DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/decisions/01a1d4e1-199d-7ac1-b40d-0f400b9fd004","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/decisions/01a1d4e1-199d-7ac1-b40d-0f400b9fd004#breadcrumb"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#website"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https://dgw.tmarket.io/decisions/01a1d4e1-199d-7ac1-b40d-0f400b9fd004"]}]},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#identity","@type":"Organization","name":"DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io"},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/decisions/01a1d4e1-199d-7ac1-b40d-0f400b9fd004#breadcrumb","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","name":"Home","item":"https://dgw.tmarket.io","position":1},{"@type":"ListItem","name":"Feed","item":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/feed","position":2},{"@type":"ListItem","name":"Верховний Суд дійшов висновку про допуск представництва без статусу адвоката під час судового контролю за виконанням судових рішень","position":3}]}]}
```

## Sitemap

See the full [sitemap](https://dgw.tmarket.io/sitemap.md) for all pages.