allegation
The General Court erred in finding that the Commission had failed to demonstrate any exclusionary effects of Google's contractual practices in connection with its online advertising intermediation platform AdSense.
A allegation by Advocate General Kokott. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
The General Court erred in finding that the Commission had failed to demonstrate any exclusionary effects of Google’s contractual practices in connection with its online advertising intermediation platform AdSense
Related claims
The Commission brought a case against Google and Alphabet concerning Google AdSense competition matters (Case C-826/24 P).post author · statementThe Constitutional Court held that questions of how exactly the cancellation of the decision affected remuneration and whether the courts correctly considered the case fall within the competence of courts of general jurisdiction.КС · statementGoogle was fined for refusing to delete 'banned content'.post author · allegationThe General Court had annulled the Commission's approval of the State aid.Court · statementThe Court sets aside the General Court's judgment by which the Commission's approval of €3.4 billion in State aid granted by the Netherlands to KLM had been annulled.Court · statementThe Court of Justice sets aside the judgment of the General Court which had annulled the approval by the Commission of €321 million in State aid from Germany for Condor.Court of Justice · investigation
More claims by Advocate General Kokott
No other claims by this actor on record.