statementSaid on 2026-11-03
The review highlights the Supreme Court's legal positions on these issues, including the specifics of organizing remote communication, resolving conflicts between parents, ensuring the child's safety and taking the child's opinion into account.
A statement by supremecourtua, said on 2026-11-03. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
В огляді висвітлено правові позиції Верховного Суду щодо цих питань, зокрема особливостей організації дистанційного спілкування, вирішення конфліктів між батьками, забезпечення безпеки дитини та врахування її думки.
Discussion
Related claims
The review covers the case law of the Civil Cassation Court within the Supreme Court on participation in upbringing and communication with children temporarily residing outside Ukraine, for decisions from 2024 to August 2026.supremecourtua · statementParticular attention is given to the legal consequences of concealing the child's place of residence abroad, to the performance of agreements between parents, and to the participation of other relatives in the child's upbringing and the resolution of related disputes in the absence of a conclusion from the guardianship and custody authority.supremecourtua · statementThe review sets out key legal positions of the Supreme Court on disputes arising from the formalization of labor relations.supremecourtua · statementThe review summarizes key legal positions of the Supreme Court formed from January 2018 to June 2026 based on consideration of the relevant category of administrative cases.supremecourtua · statementEnsuring the child's best interests, preserving the child's family ties and establishing a real and effective communication arrangement is decisive.supremecourtua · statementThe review reflects legal positions of the Administrative Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court that will matter for forming uniformity of judicial practice in resolving public-law disputes.the post author · statement
More claims by supremecourtua
The Supreme Court, composed of the joint chamber of the Civil Cassation Court, reached these conclusions while ensuring the unity of judicial practice.statementFailure by a participant to comply with a general meeting decision, in particular failure to provide documents to update information on ultimate beneficial owners, is not grounds for forced exclusion of such a participant.statementThe Law of Ukraine "On Limited and Additional Liability Companies" establishes an exhaustive list of grounds for excluding a participant from a company: non-contribution of a share and death of a participant if their heirs have not applied to the LLC with an application to join.statementA child's temporary stay outside Ukraine must not restrict the child's right to maintain regular relations with both parents.statementEnsuring the child's best interests, preserving the child's family ties and establishing a real and effective communication arrangement is decisive.statement
All claims by supremecourtua