statement

An effective way to protect the state's rights to such property is a claim to remove obstacles to the use of this property by returning it to the state.

A statement by ВП ВС. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.

ефективним способом захисту прав держави на таке майно є позов про усунення перешкод у користуванні цим майном шляхом його повернення на користь держави
supremecourtuaPublished 2026-11-02 Read source

Related claims

Protective radiation shelters/structures as objects of national importance are not subject to privatization, and an effective way to protect the state's rights to such property is a claim to remove obstacles to its use by returning it to the state.ВП ВС · statementTaking into account the rules of Articles 321, 391 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, a proper and effective way to protect the state's rights to protective radiation shelters / structures as a type of civil protection (civil defense) protective structures is a negatory claim.post author · statementProtective radiation shelters / structures, as objects of national importance, are not subject to privatization.ВП ВС · statementSuch structures belonged to objects of national importance, were in state ownership, and by their designated purpose are needed for the state to perform its functions to ensure its defense capability and protect the life and health of the population from the consequences of accidents, catastrophes of technogenic, ecological, natural and military nature.post author · statementUnder Part 2 of Article 5 of the Law of Ukraine "On Privatization of State Property", protective radiation shelters / structures, as a type of civil protection (civil defense) protective structures, were not subject to privatization (alienation).post author · statementThe Constitutional Court noted that the return of an administrative claim, if the requirement does not relate to administrative court proceedings, is connected with the delimitation of types of court proceedings and does not restrict the right to judicial protection.Конституционном суде · statement

More claims by ВП ВС

All claims by ВП ВС