--- title: "A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of… — post author — DecisionGateway" description: "statement by post author, recorded 2026-11-06 — verbatim quote and source citation." canonical_url: "https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd" meta: "og:description": "statement by post author, recorded 2026-11-06 — verbatim quote and source citation." "og:image": "https://dgw.tmarket.io/og.jpg" "og:image:alt": "White network of connected nodes crossed by a timeline on black" "og:image:height": "1024" "og:image:width": "1024" "og:title": "A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of… — post author — DecisionGateway" "twitter:image": "https://dgw.tmarket.io/og.jpg" --- > Index of every page on this site: [llms.txt](https://dgw.tmarket.io/llms.txt) statementSaid on 2026-11-06 # **A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, outside the procedures expressly provided for by that Code, is subject to appeal on the grounds provided by paragraph 17 of part 1 of Article 7 and part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, provided that such a ruling has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.** A statement by post author, said on 2026-11-06. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway. > *Ухвала слідчого судді про встановлення процесуальних строків, ухвалена на підставі статей 28, 114 КПК України поза межами процедур, які прямо передбачені цим Кодексом, підлягає апеляційному оскарженню з підстав, передбачених п. 17 ч. 1 ст. 7, ч. 1 ст. 24 КПК України за умови, що така ухвала має визначальний вплив на рух досудового розслідування чи кримінального провадження загалом.* supremecourtuaPublished 2026-11-06 [ Read source](https://t.me/supremecourtua/4413) ## **Related claims** [**A ruling by an investigating judge establishing a procedural time limit, issued outside the procedure specifically defined by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, is subject to appeal if it has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.**ВП ВС · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-aca1-7d38-a4ec-f782ead9b16c) [**A ruling of an investigating judge establishing a procedural time limit, issued outside the procedure specifically defined by the CPC of Ukraine, is subject to appeal if it has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or criminal proceedings as a whole.**ВП ВС · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4bb-706d-78ed-b80d-64a3703ad32b) [**If an accused person dies after an acquittal verdict has been appealed, the appellate court closes the appellate proceedings (or, where the verdict concerns several persons, closes them in the part concerning the deceased) on the basis of Art. 8, part 6 of Art. 9, point 5 of part 1 of Art. 284, and Art. 417 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, except where the verdict was appealed by the defense as to the motives and grounds for acquittal and close relatives or family members of the deceased insist on continuing consideration of that appeal.**Велика Палата Верховного Суду · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4c3-67ad-755e-9a97-e7870f0c512e) [**When filing applications on an additional ground, the period is calculated from the day the judicial act refuting the factual grounds of the previously issued decision enters into legal force.**Разъяснение № 2 · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d433-0fb5-7f41-9c30-bb4de53cafaa) [**The conviction was under Part 4 of Article 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.**ВАКС · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1cc9f-8314-757c-a033-1e30363d81c0) [**The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court determined the procedure for appellate review of an acquittal verdict concerning a person who died before its start.**Велика Палата Верховного Суду · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4c3-67b9-7e90-840d-ba3b06d370e3) [All claims](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims) ```json {"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#website","@type":"WebSite","description":"Decisions, events and falsifiable forecasts from 3,000+ Telegram channels — every claim cited. Read free.","name":"DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/","publisher":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#identity"}},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd#webpage","@type":"WebPage","description":"statement by post author, recorded 2026-11-06 — verbatim quote and source citation.","name":"A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of… — post author — DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd#breadcrumb"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#website"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd"]}]},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#identity","@type":"Organization","name":"DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io"},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd#breadcrumb","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","name":"Home","item":"https://dgw.tmarket.io","position":1},{"@type":"ListItem","name":"Claims","item":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims","position":2},{"@type":"ListItem","name":"A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural…","position":3}]},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd#/schema/quotation/1","@type":"Quotation","dateCreated":"2026-11-06","isBasedOn":"https://t.me/supremecourtua/4413","text":"Ухвала слідчого судді про встановлення процесуальних строків, ухвалена на підставі статей 28, 114 КПК України поза межами процедур, які прямо передбачені цим Кодексом, підлягає апеляційному оскарженню з підстав, передбачених п. 17 ч. 1 ст. 7, ч. 1 ст. 24 КПК України за умови, що така ухвала має визначальний вплив на рух досудового розслідування чи кримінального провадження загалом.","url":"/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd"}]} ``` ## Sitemap See the full [sitemap](https://dgw.tmarket.io/sitemap.md) for all pages.