statementSaid on 2026-11-09
The case centres on whether Safaricom's statements and SMS notifications provide the detailed breakdown of borrowing costs required under its terms and conditions.
A statement by post author, said on 2026-11-09. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
The case centres on whether Safaricom's statements and SMS notifications provide the detailed breakdown of borrowing costs required under its terms and conditions.
Related claims
Safaricom is facing a potential representative lawsuit over whether it adequately discloses interest and fees charged on its Fuliza overdraft service.post author · allegationThe court has not yet determined whether Safaricom breached those obligations.post author · statementSafaricom PLC's cumulative funding contribution rose to US$1.27Bn.post author · statementSafaricom and Airtel face scrutiny over the premature depletion of data bundles.businessdailyaf · investigationSafaricom Ethiopia's net loss excluding minority interests fell 43.2% to KSh 8.80Bn.post author · statementSafaricom posted a 35.9 per cent growth in net profit in the half-year to September to Sh58.1 billion, up from Sh42.7 billion a year earlier.Safaricom · statement