statement
The US strikes against Iran did not have to be popular, but they could be necessary.
A statement by Pete Hegseth. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
‘It doesn’t have to be popular, but it can be NECESSARY’ — Hegseth on US strikes against Iran
Related claims
Military action against Iran doesn't seem to be a very necessary thing.Donald Trump · statementThere appears to be no need for military action against Iran.Donald Trump · statementMarkets reacted to signs that the United States could avoid further military strikes on Iran if diplomatic efforts to end the conflict make progress.thefinancialexpressonline · statementÔng Trump cho biết Mỹ không cần tiến hành thêm các cuộc tấn công nhằm vào Iran, dù lực lượng quân sự vẫn trong trạng thái sẵn sàng.Donald Trump · statementThe US should surrender to Iran's conditions.Rezaei · statementThe US carried out defensive strikes on Iran's Qeshm Island.Gulf News headline · statement
More claims by Pete Hegseth
The US is changing the nature of its relationship with Europe: the era of defense subsidies is gradually ending.statementThe principles that US domestic and foreign policy followed for 80 years have been reconsidered.statementHegseth has called the effort politically motivated.denialHegseth says he remains calm and rejects the accusations.denialThe choice was between not acting and wishing it away, or taking a bold move, which the president did with Midnight Hammer.statement
All claims by Pete Hegseth